
2006 SUV of the Year Contenders: 2006 Hummer H3
Several chips off the old block
By Editors of Motor Trend
Photography by Brian Vance, John Kiewicz, Evan Wollenberg
It's hard to imagine people clamoring for big, thirsty sport/utilities these days, so perhaps the H3 is just the thing for the times. GM claims it's as burly and rock-crawling-capable as a Hummer H2 (okay, we're with you), uses a powerful and efficient 3.5-liter five-cylinder engine (you sure about that?), and is easier to park than many of its kind (sort of). The reality of Sport/Utility of the Year testing proved different. The H3's city/highway rating of 16/19 mpg is optimistic at best, and the pain at the gas pump is intensified by a 0-to-60-mph sprint that took over 11 seconds. The Hummer may be slow, but it sure is thirsty. In fact, it almost justifies buying the larger, marginally less fuel-efficient H2 with its whopping 6.0-liter V-8, which can at least outrun hybrid-driving environmentalists. The H3's inline-five is derived from GM's venerable 4.2-liter inline-six that produces 291 horsepower. You'd think lopping off one cylinder would reduce output by about 48 horses. Unfortunately, GM removed the magic 70-horse cylinder. As a result, the 220-horsepower I-5 gives the 4900-pound H3 all the pull and harmonics of a sewing machine. Freeway merging power? Forget it. Similar to our initial experience with a Hummer H2, the off-road-biased H3 took well to the twisty mountain roads--as long as it was pointed downhill.
Off-road, the H3 is pure Hummer: damn-near unstoppable over just about anything, though the military-spec pillbox window openings make it hard to aim it between two obstacles at a time. It's a different story inside, however. Our tester came festooned with the $3125 Luxury package that featured handsome leather seating (surfaces) with Range Rover-like contrasting piping, among other things. The Hummer H3 does one dirty deed exceptionally well and nothing else particularly well--and it ain't cheap, either. It's mostly a marketing exercise you wouldn't want to drive everyday.
...
next page >>